Author Archive

The True Cost of “Free” Social Transactions

Thursday, August 26th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

This week I had a conversation with another LinkedIn Group leader that I wanted to share —our conversation puts the challenges of social media marketing front and center.

We were discussing how the amount of noise has increased within social media networks and that there is a lot of junk out there on, for example, LinkedIn groups. She was frustrated with the amount of spammers posting advertisement and she felt she had to continuously monitor the group to make sure the interactions were professional and relevant.

I told her that the real cost of social transactions was shifting from sellers to buyers.

What does this mean?

If you think about it, we don’t really bother to consider the true cost of our time on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, industry forums and communities, blogs, etc. Beyond the value that you get from sharing with friends and colleagues (my wife posts baby pictures up on Facebook for far-away family and friends) there is a lot of stuff that sucks time away that may not only be useless but actually a true waste of time.  Beyond slightly amusing posts my friends share…. do I really need to wade through that and the 50 other meaningless announcements on my Facebook home page to find the one nugget that is worth it?

Furthermore, how many LinkedIn group posts are a blatant sales pitch, job request, and link bait to visit your website before I tune out your group?  How many SPAM emails do I have to delete on a daily basis to keep my inbox clear for my real work? BTW – I delete pretty much everything that doesn’t have a person sending and personally addressed to me. Email marketing doesn’t really work with me. Probably most people are feeling the same way.

There is no question that there is a fundamental shift occurring on the web.   The cost of information distribution is shifting to the consumer from the distributor –social media is accelerating this. Facebook is free to post and to read. However, it costs some time to post, but it is taking a huge cost of time to filter the amount of information to read that “right” post.

Now, this may sound esoteric, but think about this on an enterprise level and from a productivity perspective. The amount of emails, posts, articles, powerpoints, etc. and you realize:

  1. We are overwhelmed with information
  2. It is costly, in terms of productivity, for our employees
  3. Social media is contributing to the problem of noise
  4. We don’t have good information filters to help our organizations yet
  5. Social marketing if done correctly, can help with the problem in that we can use “trusted sources” to credential and filter information
  6. The costs will continue to rise in terms of productivity if we don’t begin to focus on the problem.
  7. Customers actually pay a transaction cost for your marketing.
  8. The currency they use is their attention. Considering how busy many executives are, spending 10 seconds reading your email is a costly time consumer when you consider how many emails they get on a daily basis
  9. If your marketing transaction costs are too high because it isn’t relevant, timely, focused, and credentialed; you negatively impact your relationship
  10. Customers are reacting to the “hidden” costs. Companies that are SPAMMING them are losing attention and actually losing brand equity.

So, what is the solution?

The paradigm shift that needs to be made in order to capture what is going on in the market, leverage the opportunity that social brings, and accommodate the practical lens of the executive, today’s professionals need to think about customer engagement in terms of “cost of attention” instead of “cost of customer acquisition.” With this new perspective, then focus your social business transactions to provide:

  • High quality
  • High value
  • High integrity

This will increase the customer’s perception of your importance, lower the noise in the market, and will translate to the bottom line in terms of financial transactions.  We are all trying to discuss and navigate through the speed of social, but not many are taking account the paradigm shifts necessary to help make social relevant to the enterprise.  I hope this blog post is a step in that direction.  Would welcome your thoughts.

Is Your Best Customer an Educated Customer?

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft
Seemingly simple question, but one with huge implications in a socially-transparent world. I have worked for some folks over the years who were “nice guys” until they got in a room with a potential customer and turned into sharks. Their belief was that they needed to close the customer as soon as possible and with as much margin as possible.

Forget value-based pricing, it was “Caveat Emptor” or buyer-beware pricing. Their best customer was an uneducated client who didn’t understand the value of the offering. They preyed off of the buyers ignorance.

As any of us who run businesses know, it is a struggle to find the right balance between customer and company needs in a relationship. Customers do not really appreciate martyrdom when you cannot deliver at a ludicrously low price. Some buyers look for predatory deals on their own side as well. At the end of the day, win-lose negotiating means someone loses.

I have always believed in win-win relationships with customers. My belief is that you operate as if the client has all of the available information and you treat them respectfully as an educated buyer with all of the benefits in the negotiation and represent their interests even if they cannot. Integrity is not bought or sold, it is earned. Sometimes at great cost and sacrifice. And it is always constantly challenged.

I have also always believed that you can “win” with integrity and that eventually those who practice predatory business practices will be exposed.

Social media has the opportunity to profoundly impact market transparency. My sincere hope is that it will be easier for buyers to get a more “accurate” picture of the value of the offering and the integrity of the provider. Markets become more efficient with better information so I believe that the ability to check references, get self-educated, and validate product claims will make markets more efficient and reduce the ability for “bad actors” to operate.

I think those who believe in “an educated buyer” are already participating in social media for the right reasons. The “give to get” model of providing thought leadership and market education has helped many. Not sure yet that it is affecting market behavior on a macro-level, but I am always hopeful.

 

Where are we in the Social Business Maturity Spectrum?

Friday, July 30th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

I posted a discussion thread last week in the Social Executive Council and contiued with a blog post that outlines my belief that we are seeing social saturation in many markets. Nukes aren’t valuable if everyone has them and isn’t afraid to use them. The same with tweets…

I an not complaining, rather I think this is a part of the normal evolution of technology lifecycles. If you look at the web, we saw the same evolution from:
* Pioneers
* Evangelists
* Adopters
*Adapters
* Commoditizers

I think we are seeing the end of “first mover advantage” for many markets and seeing the transition to the adopters phase. We have had to tell several CEOs that we cannot broadcast message our way to awareness in their market as there are too many players creating too much noise. We have to do a different approach.

The analogy is that you are in the back of a tradeshow with a 1000 booths and 100,000 attendees with a rented 10X10 booth. How do you get attention when the front booths have rented Bon Jovi for their booth. Screaming doesn’t work, flashy colors seems great until you realize that the 9 other guys in the back with you are copying you. It now looks like a wall of color versus eye appeal. What do you do? We work on making sure that awareness, credentialling, and a relationship happens prior to the prospective customer reaching the floor.

Different stages require different strategies. What worked last year may be commoditized this year in terms of marketing or customer expectations; especially in fast moving technology maturity cycles.

Think about the web: 1994 and 1995 was a hyuge explosion for consumers, but 1996-1997 was big for first mover wave of companies. By 1998 and 1999, companies we moving into niches and adapting the technology for their markets and innovating new unique technologies. This has continued through the last decade. But when you have $29.99 ecommerce ready store front website – much of the basic website development is now a commodity and nas been for a while. On the other end of the specturm, social media spawned out ot his wave and is nolw on its own arc.

What do you think? Am I too early to declare some markets saturated? If you believe that your market is saturated, what are you doing differently to break through the noise? How are you integrating this back into a larger corporate strategy around managing customers, employees, and partners?

Or are you wondering how I can declare something saturated when you haven’t even started? Well, my suggestion is that if you look at your market and see everyone else doing the same thing over and over again, think outside the box and don’t just do it too. You are contributing to the noise, not adding value…. from a customer’s perspective, which would I appreciate?

Social Marketing Is & Isn’t

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

Social marketing is an “effective way to build relationships over Social Media”

  • Effective – Defined as cost effective, efficient, focused, specific, works
  • Relationships – Defined as having both recognized value and emotional connection
  • Social Media – platform independent; not just LinkedIn, Facebook, or Twitter, but the right platform to support the right interaction

 Social Marketing is not…

  • Just Another Channel – old form over new medium hasn’t worked with the transition from print or TV to internet, why wouldn’t a new form of interaction require new rules?
  • Just about Creative Branding – How many cool TV ads where you can’t remember the company afterwards. Creative just creates awareness, but not necessarily leads to a buying relationship.
  • Build “It & They Will Come” – Despite your brilliance, you still have to build a relationship to the community (credibility) and you have to actively promote your solution(evangelize)
  • Magic Relationship Bullet – just because I connect to you doesn’t mean we are friends, or even acquaintances. Hell, I don’t even know you…. Etiquette rules still apply.
  • SPAM me into a Relationship – “No matter how many times you send it (awareness), I don’t care (interest), don’t want it (relevance), won’t buy it (relationship).”

 Social Media (Marketing) is about having a presence, Social Marketing is about having a purpose….

10 Ways Marketers Quickly Kill Online Social Relationships

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft
  1. Invite me to your local social networking events that are completely across town & send me a different invite every day
  2. Invite me to Mafia Wars, Farmville, Star Wars, and any number of games on Facebook. If you are the 428th person to invite me, what makes you think I will join now. For the record, I am not an online sim type game player, I am a news junkie (business and politics), send me that stuff. Better yet, ask me what I am interested in…
  3. Just because we are connected on a social network does not make us friends. Not sure that even classifies as acquaintances. Etiquette rules still apply.
  4. No matter how many times you spam me with your special of the week or forwarded tweet, I will not think better of you.
  5. I delete canned spam messages in my inbox from people that I don’t know or don’t recognize. I can’t keep up, gave up. Even if from social media sites…
  6. No, I won’t connect to you on Facebook if you send me a cold introduction from countries that are possible sources of terrorists or identify theft suspect.
  7. Inviting me to the “latest” social media platform from a canned system generated email is so 2005.
  8. Not having a clear way to delete my profile from said type platforms is even worse
  9. Just because you have 200,000 fans on your corporate facebook page does not mean that your customer service has improved.
  10. No, I don’t generally connect to corporate twitter accounts unless I have a real reason to connect. Even if I do, doesn’t mean that I am a loyal customer.

I will throw in some freebies – No matter how many emails your email marketing system sends me, I will NEVER have a relationship with the system. You may be able to catch my interest, you may be able to even get me to buy something, but we will never have a relationship. Relationships involve emotions, systems involve information and data. See the disconnect?

The challenge is that many organizations have lost sight of the fact that, although they have tons of customers, even tens of millions, buyer behavior has to involve both emotion and intellect. Creative marketing does not create passionate buyers. Just because Apple or Google creates great ads does not mean that I will run out and buy the product. You need great product; you need some compelling value proposition beyond just a presence or brand recall. How are you going to rise above the noise?

You ever see an ad campaign that was started 10 years ago and was a hit that is so now over-done that you pray that it dies a slow death? You wish you could just reach out to the VP of Marketing and the AD team and beg them to try something different. A couple of keys there… Despite recall there is negative brand equity and an extreme desire to talk to someone to explain what they are doing wrong in alienating the market. Faceless corporate entity that has stopped listening and focused on “branding”.

Just because you create a great Facebook page does not mean that fans will flock to your site and you will be written up in the Marketer’s Hall of Fame. Not that I am sure there is even one to begin one… How does Facebook posts tie back to brand strategy let alone revenue or corporate objectives. You may have a plan, but if it isn’t evident, it isn’t working…. And don’t get me started on how Twitter isn’t a marketing strategy…. … or that it isn’t a plan if I can’t read it…

Remember Fields of Dreams – “Build it and they will come….” – the real miracle isn’t that they had ghost players in the field, but rather that they built a baseball field in the middle of Iowa and people showed up, even after compelling visions…

It is like going to a Consumer Electronics Show -like tradeshow (125,000 attendees and 1000+ booths) and you have a 10X10 booth in the back. How are you going to get people to come to your booth? If you try the tried and true approach of branded shaped squeeze toys like you neighbor selling electronic, remote control dogs over there, you might as well go home. You don’t have the budget to hire Aerosmith to rock out in your booth, and you don’t have a bevy of massage tables to give free massages. How are you going to get attention and build sufficient traffic to get your percentage?

The reality is that social media is a tradeshow or conference in the sky. Human nature is human nature online or offline, it is the same. Rules of engagement and extent of connection are different, but the core interactions and motivations are the same.

You have to establish relationship, understand motivations, build momentum, give value before asking, establish trust, support their buying process, and be relevant to their needs. Oh, and make sure that you are high enough on their priority list so they pay attention. The rest is about etiquette, influence, and value….

Defining the Social CIO

Friday, April 30th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

I spoke at SIM Atlanta last week on behalf of the Social Executive Council (SEC) with Dan Webber, CIO at Avery Partners and VP of the SEC. I was the stand in for Judy, who is the President of the SEC. Our discussion was on the difference between Social Media Policies and Social Governance. This was a first part in a series on the Social CIO. It has been amazing to me how receptive CIOs are to the idea of socially enabling the enterprise. As much as I speak and write to the Social CMOs, approximately 1/3 of the SEC members are CIOs. CIOs are an important part of the social enablement movement. I believe a critical one as I do not believe organizations can do this without cross-functional coordination.

For SIM Atlanta, we started the presentation last week with a strong statement about what is a Social CIO:

If you believe that the social disruption will impact the enterprise:

  • Role of CIO and IT must evolve
  • Information management will now encompass the adoption, motivation, and collaboration around the distribution of information.
  • IT Architectures will need to take into account for the fluid nature of social interactions (unstructured) and the overwhelming amount of information (contextualization and filtering) to handle the real-time needs of their organizations
  • The IT organization that can absorb this and lead the transformation will be strengthened within the organization.
  • The IT organizations that cannot keep up will be marginalized.
  • The Social CIO is architect for the social enablement of the enterprise

 

What we didn’t do last week was outline the areas that will be impacted by the Social CIO, here are the 5 areas that we believe are the starting point:

  • Social Architecture – defining the next generation of information architecture to support the fluid information needs of the socially enabled enterprise
  • Social Experience – building the platform to support the socially enabled customer lifecycle; includes CRM, contact centers, sales and marketing support
  • Social Intelligence – integrating the wealth of behavioral information that is generated within online communities and social interactions. Think the ability to differentiate between browsers and shoppers or better qualify leads.
  • Enterprise Social Search – Defining the ability to find information or expertise across the enterprise. Now add the complexity that the organization may or may not own the information, it may be in the “cloud” and it may be unstructured. How do you build a roadmap to manage the ability for your organization to find stuff in a socially enabled enterprise?
  • Social Governance – It governance is about protecting the information and intellectual property assets of the organization, about bringing a systematic approach to leverage and consuming technology resources, and planning IT initiatives in a structured way. Social governance takes that to the next level in how do you manage structure in an unstructured environment. How do you define IP when the content is user generated? Who owns a relationship when it is done under the corporate aegis, but is done through a personal Linkedin account? Where does personal end and professional begin? You can’t answer these questions till you have a Social Governance plan to map your corporate assets, understand what will be socially enabled, how you will manage the distribution process, measure and monitor it, and make sure that you can effectively communicate responsibilities to it.

Social CIOs are figuring out that they are just at the crawl stage in terms of socially enabling the organization. The good news is that they don’t have to do it alone, as a matter of fact, they aren’t alone, and they are in good company as most companies are still crawling. The real problem for Social CIOs is that many of their companies are starting to walk and run in social marketing. If they don’t get their social architectural planning established quickly, they may find the resulting unstructured chaos may become permanent.

Social Media Versus Social Marketing

Friday, April 30th, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

We spend a good amount of time discussing socially enabling the enterprise, but there is another side of our business that is focused on servicing the small to medium sized business market (SMB) with social marketing services.

As Joanne Sanders, our social marketing practice leader says “The difference between social media and social marketing?  Social media is about participation –it is about the activities that go on within the platforms.  Social marketing is about purpose —it is about coordinating an overarching strategy involving multiple social /communication elements.”

Now, this doesn’t mean go out and fire your marketing or communications firm because they keep explaining that you need more friends on your Facebook page, but like any creative endeavor it needs focus. Start with a defined goal, identify the strategies that make sense, and then focus your creative partner on creating the best, most compelling content. Social marketing is done correctly is about building the right relationships in the right way with the key influencers (both market and company) that will establish credibility with a decision maker prior to your engagement with them directly. If you don’t, you may not get an opportunity to do it direct.

We also find that although many smaller companies appreciate strategy, they cannot feel comfortable using their limited dollars to invest in strategy without a return. They don’t pay for consulting; they pay for execution and results. Here are some of the objectives that we would put forward to define a really good program, all of which can be tracked and measured:

  • Online Lead Generation
  • Credentialing In The Market
  • Expand Online Footprint
  • Reach External And Internal Buying Influencers
  • Build Market Evangelists For Your Company
  • Distribution Channel / Partner Identification
  • Develop Industry Relationships

Social marketing is about purpose AND alignment to your business, social media is about participation and relationships.

Building A Social Marketing Business Case – Part 1 – Definitions

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

This multi-part series will provide information on social marketing and answer the following questions:

  • What is it? (I already can hear, not another buzz word….)
  • Why is a new definition required beyond Social Media, Social Networking, Social CRM, or Web 2.0 Marketing? (gotcha there)
  • So what? Why should I  worry about this? Hint: Revenue Generation and Customer Referrals (I assume this would be important to you)
  • What does a Social Marketing strategy look like?
  • What does a Social Marketing Roadmap look like for this?
  • How do I leverage what I am already doing?
  • How do I build a Social Marketing Business Case?
  • How do I measure Social Marketing?

Now that I got the major questions out of the way, let move next into the definitions;

Social Marketing – The re-orientation of traditional marketing to reflect the new post-digital,  network relationship oriented, and influencer-driven social interactions. Social Marketing leverages a multi-channel, multi-directional approach towards building relationships with a transition away from the structured Marketing roles of product management, product marketing, marketing communications, public relations, channel marketing, sales support. Instead, marketing is reoriented around enabling the key interactions that support the buying process.

Social Media – Basically, you have the social networks that you participate and the online communities that you own which are built into your corporate website. See my post on Social Media is Like Fishing for more details. Social Media is changing buyer behavior, coming more fluid, and marketing must adjust the model to to support the reflected changes. See my post on the Changing Role of the CMO for further explanation. Read more

Online Communities – communities of interest built upon a foundation of Web 2.0 social networking tools; profile, blog, wiki, social bookmarking, calendaring, media sharing, etc that enable the user to interact with other users and content through the website. See my post on Online Community Blueprint for more details.

Post-Digital - If everything is becoming digital, why does digital matter? The buyer doesn’t really care if the interaction is on the web, they just want to get what they need. A lot of marketing still segments online and offline which creates an artificial barrier to developing a seamless customer experience.

Social is the “New” Customer Experience

Thursday, April 1st, 2010 by Matthew Rosenhaft

A friend of mine and I have been emailing about the value of “social media”. Like most skeptics, the conversation is that social media is just a marketing channel. From the skeptic’s perspective, social media is about twitter, linkedin, facebook, youtube, etc. If viewed from that perspective, he is right. Social media doesn’t rise to the top of the priority list. Although consumer products’ budgets are migrating to social media, most of those budgets are creative advertising, games, promotions, etc. Directors of Marketing Communications worry about those budgets, CMOs worry about market share, valuation, new product innovation, sales and channels, etc.

Well and good, but there is a “but”…

In my opinion, CMOs need to “get the impact of social on the enterprise” as it is one of the most critical disruptions that we have seen in the last 15 years. We lived through the web disruption, this will be equally as disruptive. My friend is right that CMO’s don’t get fired or hired for “social media”, but they will get fired or hired for performance; which is going to be impacted on their ability to leverage “social” in their customer lifecycles.

Our consulting business is about socially enabling the enterprise, in particular, the end-to-end customer lifecycle. Lead generation over public social networks is only a small part of it. Customer retention rates, churn rates, customer satisfaction, referrals, etc. are all a part of the customer experience. We are seeing a fundamental change in the way customers (B-to-B, B-to-C, Channels) expect to interact. Social CRM is the first step, but it needs to be more strategic, cross-functional and impactful to reach its full potential.

We are seeing the set plays that Marketing used to call FAIL faster because they aren’t fluid enough to react to the dynamic flow of information. By the way, it isn’t only CMOs… CIOs are hungry for how to manage, VPs of HR, VPs of Sales, Channels, etc. Yes, I see CMOs getting churned much faster if they don’t perform, but because they can’t figure out how to leverage social strategy to compete. Social Market Leaders will become Market Share leaders.

As an example, we gone into several large companies recently and recommended  in the initial meeting that they change their sales and marketing strategy based upon the social market research that we then present to them. All outside, public information.

We are not playing “gotcha” with them, we are showing how Social is the “New” Customer Experience. Buyers are approaching the buying research, selection, and validation process is now very different because of social media. Not about the technology or “chatting with friends”, but about business impact.

Not only did they listen to us, but it validated their perceptions in the market as to the challenges they were seeing. By the way, these aren’t leading edge, consumer internet software companies, but  ”Old School” brick and mortar B-to-B companies…

Interestingly enough, we started with a good number of skeptics at the start of the meetings. We were brought in by executive sponsors; who wanted to get the rest of their executive teams around the need for a  “social media” plan, but their teams didn’t realize how strategic this could become.

You know that you are in a disruption when the pace of change feels overwhelming. Information is just pouring over the wall and you are trying to keep up. We were there with the last major disruption with the world wide web in the mid-90’s. Small companies were figuring out how to leverage the web to drive massive growth, much of it at the expense of larger companies that were caught looking at the web with distain or disbelief.

Don’t be THAT person!!!! if you don’t understand, there are many free and/or paid resources to get educated. Doesn’t mean that you throw out your existing business model and “kamikaze” your marketing resources into social media, but at least have a social marketing plan with a roadmap, milestones, budget, and performance measurement.